[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57165592.50706@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:58:10 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, linus.walleij@...aro.org
Cc: gnurou@...il.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: tegra: Remove the need of keeping device handle
for gpio driver
On 04/18/2016 11:00 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> On Monday 18 April 2016 09:59 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 04/18/2016 02:46 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>> Remove the file static device handle variable as this is just
>>> required for prints. The required handle can be stored in
>>> tegra_gpio_chip and hence it become redundancy.
>>
>> This seems fine as far as it goes, but if it's worth doing this,
>> please move all the globals into the GPIO chip rather than just one of
>> the 7 globals.
>
> the device pointer is part of the gpiochip and so it is better to use
> gpiochip parent member instead of locally duplicating.
>
> However, moving to other global variables needs some major changes and I
> think it should be treated as independent of this patch.
> This patch just utilizes the gpiochip.parent here.
Looking at the patch this just trades using one global (dev) for another
(tegra_gpio_chip), so when the other globals are removed, you'll need to
go back and change tegra_gpio_irq_set_type() again to remove use of the
global tegra_gpio_chip.
Still, this /does/ remove one global so I guess it's OK. I don't feel
terribly strongly, especially if you're going to send more patches soon
to remove the other globals. I'll leave the call to Linus.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists