[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57165AAE.8050108@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 21:49:58 +0530
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <gnurou@...il.com>,
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] gpio: tegra: Add support for gpio debounce
On Tuesday 19 April 2016 09:41 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 03:43 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> NVIDIA's Tegra210 support the HW debounce in the GPIO
>> controller for all its GPIO pins.
>>
>> Add support for setting debounce timing by implementing the
>> set_debounce callback of gpiochip.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-tegra.c
>
>> @@ -327,6 +360,9 @@ static int tegra_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
>> tegra_gpio_writel(bank->oe[p], GPIO_OE(gpio));
>> tegra_gpio_writel(bank->int_lvl[p], GPIO_INT_LVL(gpio));
>> tegra_gpio_writel(bank->int_enb[p], GPIO_INT_ENB(gpio));
>> + tegra_gpio_writel(bank->dbc_cnt[p], GPIO_DBC_CNT(gpio));
>> + tegra_gpio_writel(bank->dbc_enb[p],
>> + GPIO_MSK_DBC_EN(gpio));
>
> Why not just write to the "regular" register rather than the mask
> register here...
There is no regular register for enabling debounce. Only masked register
exist.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists