lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <571682A1.9010000@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:10:25 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] ARM: dts: db600c: add pmic regulator supplies

On 04/12/2016 02:33 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> This patch adds pmic regulator supplies connected on the board.
> Rest of the invidual regulators would be added as and when required by
> the devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-arrow-db600c.dts | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-arrow-db600c.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-arrow-db600c.dts
> index 57d4500..6695b00 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-arrow-db600c.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064-arrow-db600c.dts
> @@ -9,7 +9,69 @@
>  		serial1 = &gsbi1_serial;
>  	};
>  
> +	regulators {
> +		compatible = "simple-bus";
> +		vph: regulator-fixed@1 {
> +			compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +			regulator-min-microvolt = <4500000>;
> +			regulator-max-microvolt = <4500000>;
> +			regulator-name = "VPH";
> +			regulator-type = "voltage";
> +			regulator-boot-on;
> +		};
> +	};

Just curious why we added the vph supply? Is that for some framework
requirement? We haven't done this on other boards, although we probably
should if there's a good reason for it.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ