[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1461101600.32510.207.camel@buserror.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 16:33:20 -0500
From: Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>
To: Alessio Igor Bogani <alessio.bogani@...ttra.eu>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] powerpc/86xx: Add support for Emerson/Artesyn
MVME7100
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 10:33 +0200, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Thanks for reviewing it!
>
> On 19 April 2016 at 06:26, Scott Wood <oss@...error.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 09:57 +0200, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
> > > + pci0: pcie@...08000 {
> > > + reg = <0xf1008000 0x1000>;
> > > + ranges = <0x02000000 0x0 0x80000000 0x80000000 0x0
> > > 0x50000000
> > > + 0x01000000 0x0 0x00000000 0xf0000000 0x0
> > > 0x00800000>;
> [...]
> > > +
> > > + pci1: pcie@...09000 {
> > > + compatible = "fsl,mpc8641-pcie";
> > > + device_type = "pci";
> > > + #size-cells = <2>;
> > > + #address-cells = <3>;
> > > + reg = <0xf1009000 0x1000>;
> > > + bus-range = <0 0xff>;
> >
> > Why are pci0 and pci1 so different? Why does mpc8641si-post.dtsi not have
> > pci1?
>
> You are right. The MPC8641 processor offers two pci so
> mpc8641si-post.dtsi should be the right place where to define both.
> What about the boards which don't use the pci1? Will 'status =
> "disabled"' be enough?
Yes.
-Scott
Powered by blists - more mailing lists