[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+ybv2=sNW_FWBOnThuh_Lfv32jwYC++vxoy2CxqNw2ig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:30:00 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6 v2] of: Implement iterator for phandles
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a new version of the implementation of the iterator
> over phandles concept which Rob Herring suggested to me some
> time ago. My approach is a little bit different from what
> the diff showed back then, but it gets rid of the allocation
> and 'struct of_phandle_args' misuse.
>
> I also converted the arm-smmu driver to make use of the
> iterator. The resulting kernel boots on my AMD Seattle
> system and fixes the warning triggered there. The patches
> now also pass all dt-unittests in my kvm environment.
>
> Patches are based on v4.6-rc2
Series now applied.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists