[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKi4VAKExQPMFgFv+VGvqxGsu47aF1UxDtoExWWh5DXY36B=LA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 02:10:16 -0300
From: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Crestez Dan Leonard <leonard.crestez@...el.com>,
Denis Ciocca <denis.ciocca@...com>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
Giuseppe BARBA <giuseppe.barba@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...el.com>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ator.liu.se>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] iio: st: Add lsm9ds0 support for gyro accel and magny
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 18/04/16 11:25, Crestez Dan Leonard wrote:
>> On 04/18/2016 09:07 AM, Denis Ciocca wrote:
>> Then st_combo_* implementation functions would forward to st_magn_* or
>> st_accel_* depending on chan->type. Does this make sense?
> Perhaps. If you have a short term need for this perhaps Denis and you can
> work together to speed up what he has 'in the works' for this?
> No point in duplicating work!
>
> The gyro element can go forward separately in the meantime.
Isn't LSM9DS0 just a package of LSM303D and L3GD20 that could reuse
the drivers already present?
Lucas De Marchi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists