linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/137] 4.4.8-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160419055613.GB19287@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Apr 2016 14:56:13 +0900
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	"kernelci.org bot" <bot@...nelci.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
	shuah.kh@...sung.com, patches@...nelci.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 000/137] 4.4.8-stable review

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:47:13AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
> stable-queue boot: 207 boots: 4 failed, 202 passed with 1 offline (v4.4.7-137-ge7e3ac8ffeb8)
> 
> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-queue/kernel/v4.4.7-137-ge7e3ac8ffeb8/
> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-queue/kernel/v4.4.7-137-ge7e3ac8ffeb8/
> 
> Tree: stable-queue
> Branch: local/linux-4.4.y.queue
> Git Describe: v4.4.7-137-ge7e3ac8ffeb8
> Git Commit: e7e3ac8ffeb83283846cee3690cbac5cb87499dc
> Git URL: git://server.roeck-us.net/git/linux-stable.git
> Tested: 42 unique boards, 12 SoC families, 26 builds out of 139
> 
> Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.4.7-137-ge7e3ac8ffeb8&fail
> 
> arm:
> 
>     multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y:
>         socfpga_cyclone5_socrates: 1 failed lab
> 
>     imx_v4_v5_defconfig:
>         imx27-phytec-phycard-s-rdk: 1 failed lab
> 
>     multi_v5_defconfig:
>         imx27-phytec-phycard-s-rdk: 1 failed lab
> 
>     socfpga_defconfig:
>         socfpga_cyclone5_socrates: 1 failed lab

Are these failures to be expected?

thanks,

greg k-h