| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:00:33 +0000
From: Prabu Thangamuthu <Prabu.T@...opsys.com>
To: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Prabu Thangamuthu <Prabu.T@...opsys.com>,
"Ulf Hansson (ulf.hansson@...aro.org)" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>,
Andrei Pistirica <andrei.pistirica@...rochip.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
Joshua Henderson <joshua.henderson@...rochip.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
CC: Manjunath M Bettegowda <Manjunath.MB@...opsys.com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
CPGS <cpgs@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci-pci: add Support of Synopsys DWC_MSHC IP
Hi Jaehoon Chung,
Thank you for detailed review comments.
On 04/19/2016 04:31 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 04:18 PM, Prabu Thangamuthu wrote:
> > Synopsys DWC_MSHC is compliant with SD Host Specifications. This patch
> > is to support DWC_MSHC controller on PCI interface.
>
> There is dwmmc controller for Synopsys DWC_MSHC.
> According to commit message, dwmmc controller also is compliant with SD
> host specifications.
>
> I think it's enough to use "sdhci-dwc".(To prevent confusion.)
For Information, Synopsys has two different host controllers,
1. dw_mmc - It's old controller and not compliant with SDHCI specification.
2. dwc_mshc - It's new controller and compliant with SDHCI specification.
This patch is to support second controller (dwc_mshc).
As you mentioned, we will use "sdhci-dwc" instead of Synopsys DWC_MSHC
to avoid confusion.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Prabu Thangamuthu <prabu.t@...opsys.com>
> > ---
> > Change log v2:
> > -Removed Synopsys specific PCI device ID's from pci_ids.h.
> > -Updated the PCI device ID's in sdhci-pci-core.c.
> >
> > MAINTAINERS | 7 +
> > drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 3 +-
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-dwc-mshc-pci.c | 298
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-dwc-mshc-pci.h | 58 +++++++
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 14 ++
> > 5 files changed, 379 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644
> > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-dwc-mshc-pci.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-dwc-mshc-pci.h
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 1d5b4be..b260b97 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -9751,6 +9751,13 @@ S: Maintained
> > F: include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
> > F: drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc*
> >
> > +SYNOPSYS SDHCI COMPLIANT DWC MSHC DRIVER
> > +M: Prabu Thangamuthu <prabu.t@...opsys.com>
> > +M: Manjunath M B <manjumb@...opsys.com>
> > +L: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
> > +S: Maintained
> > +F: drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-dwc-mshc*
> > +
> > SYSTEM TRACE MODULE CLASS
> > M: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
> > S: Maintained
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile b/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile
> > index af918d2..1d2a3cf 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile
> > @@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_MXC) += mxcmmc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_MXS) += mxs-mmc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI) += sdhci.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_PCI) += sdhci-pci.o
> > -sdhci-pci-y += sdhci-pci-core.o sdhci-pci-o2micro.o
> > +sdhci-pci-y += sdhci-pci-core.o sdhci-pci-o2micro.o \
> > + sdhci-dwc-mshc-pci.o
>
> how about using sdhci-pci-XXX?
OK, We will update it accordingly.
> > obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_PCI)) += sdhci-pci-data.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ACPI) += sdhci-acpi.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_PXAV3) += sdhci-pxav3.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-dwc-mshc-pci.c
> > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-dwc-mshc-pci.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..e934af4
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-dwc-mshc-pci.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,298 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2016 Synopsys, Inc.
> > + *
> > + * Author: Manjunath M B <manjumb@...opsys.com>
> > + *
> > + * This software is licensed under the terms of the GNU General
> > +Public
> > + * License version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation,
> > +and
> > + * may be copied, distributed, and modified under those terms.
> > + *
> > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> > + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> > +
> > +#include "sdhci.h"
> > +#include "sdhci-pci.h"
> > +#include "sdhci-dwc-mshc-pci.h"
> > +
> >
> +/*********************************************************
> ********************\
> > + * *
> > + * Hardware specific clock handling *
> > + * *
> >
> +\*********************************************************
> ********************/
> > +static const struct sdhci_ops *sdhci_ops; /* Low level hw interface */
> > +
> > +static void sdhci_set_clock_snps(struct sdhci_host *host,
> > + unsigned int clock)
> > +{
> > + int div = 0;
> > + int mul = 0;
> > + int div_val = 0;
> > + int mul_val = 0;
> > + int mul_div_val = 0;
> > + int reg = 0;
> > + u16 clk = 0;
> > + u32 vendor_ptr;
> > + unsigned long timeout;
> > + u32 tx_clk_phase_val = SDHC_DEF_TX_CLK_PH_VAL;
> > + u32 rx_clk_phase_val = SDHC_DEF_RX_CLK_PH_VAL;
> > +
> > + /* DWC MSHC Specific clock settings */
>
> I think this comment don't need..because this file already is IP specific.
>
OK, We will update it.
> > +
> > + /* if clock is less than 25MHz, divided clock is used.
> > + * For divided clock, we can use the standard sdhci_set_clock().
> > + * For clock above 25MHz, DRP clock is used
> > + * Here, we cannot use sdhci_set_clock(), we need to program
> > + * TX RX CLOCK DCM DRP for appropriate clock
> > + */
> > +
> > + vendor_ptr = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_UHS2_VENDOR);
> > +
> > + if (clock <= 25000000) {
> > + /* Then call generic set_clock */
> > + sdhci_ops->set_clock(host, clock);
> > + } else {
> > +
> > + host->mmc->actual_clock = 0;
> > +
> > + /* Select un-phase shifted clock before reset Tx Tuning
> DCM*/
> > + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > + reg &= ~SDHC_TX_CLK_SEL_TUNED;
> > + sdhci_writew(host, reg, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > + mdelay(10);
> > +
> > + sdhci_writew(host, 0, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> > +
> > + if (clock == 0)
> > + return;
>
> Why return here? Can this locate above?
>
We will remove it as it's dead code.
> > +
> > + /* Lets chose the Mulitplier value to be 0x2 */
> > + mul = 0x2;
> > + for (div = 1; div <= 32; div++) {
> > + if (((host->max_clk * mul) / div)
> > + <= clock)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + /*
> > + * Set Programmable Clock Mode in the Clock
> > + * Control register.
> > + */
> > + div_val = div - 1;
> > + mul_val = mul - 1;
> > +
> > + host->mmc->actual_clock = (host->max_clk * mul) / div;
> > + /* Program the DCM DRP */
> > + /* Step 1: Assert DCM Reset */
>
> I think more readable that you write the all steps on here.
> /*
> * Step1 :...
> * Step2 :...
>
OK, We will update it.
> > + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > + reg = reg | SDHC_CARD_TX_CLK_DCM_RST;
>
> reg |= SDHC_CARD_...
>
OK, We will update it.
> > + sdhci_writew(host, reg, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > +
> > + /* Step 2: Program the mul and div values in DRP */
> > + mul_div_val = (mul_val << 8) | div_val;
> > + sdhci_writew(host, mul_div_val,
> TXRX_CLK_DCM_MUL_DIV_DRP);
> > +
> > + /* Step 3: issue a dummy read from DRP base 0x00 as per
> > + *
> www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/user_guides/ug191.pdf
> > + */
> > + reg = sdhci_readw(host, TXRX_CLK_DCM_DRP_BASE_51);
>
> This code is workaroud for issue?
>
This is not an issue.
We use Dynamic Reconfigurable Port(DRP) of Xilinx Digital Clock Manager(DCM).
To restore DCM status output, read from DRP base 0x00 is needed as per document
mentioned.
> > +
> > + /* Step 4: De-Assert reset to DCM */
> > + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > + reg &= ~SDHC_CARD_TX_CLK_DCM_RST;
> > + sdhci_writew(host, reg, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > +
> > + clk |= SDHCI_PROG_CLOCK_MODE | SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_EN;
> > + sdhci_writew(host, clk, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> > +
> > + /* Wait max 20 ms */
> > + timeout = 20;
> > + while (!((clk = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL))
> > + & SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_STABLE)) {
> > + if (timeout == 0) {
> > + pr_err("%s: Internal clock never stabilised\n",
> > + mmc_hostname(host->mmc));
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + timeout--;
> > + mdelay(1);
> > + }
> > +
> > + clk |= SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN;
> > + sdhci_writew(host, clk, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> > +
> > + /* For some bit-files we may have to do phase shifting for
> > + * Tx Clock; Let's do it here
> > + */
> > + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > + reg = reg | SDHC_TUNING_TX_CLK_DCM_RST;
>
> Ditto.
>
OK, We will update it.
> > + sdhci_writew(host, reg, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > + mdelay(10);
> > + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > + reg &= ~SDHC_TUNING_TX_CLK_DCM_RST;
> > + sdhci_writew(host, reg, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > +
> > + /* Select working phase value if clock is <= 50MHz */
> > + if (clock <= 50000000) {
> > + /*Change the Phase value here */
> > + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT +
> vendor_ptr));
> > + reg = reg | (SDHC_TUNING_TX_CLK_SEL_MASK &
> > + (tx_clk_phase_val <<
> SDHC_TUNING_TX_CLK_SEL_SHIFT));
> > + sdhci_writew(host, reg, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT +
> vendor_ptr));
> > + mdelay(10);
> > +
> > + /* Program to select phase shifted clock */
> > + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT +
> vendor_ptr));
> > + reg = reg | SDHC_TX_CLK_SEL_TUNED;
> > + sdhci_writew(host, reg, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT +
> vendor_ptr));
> > + mdelay(10);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* This Clock might have affected the RX CLOCK DCM
> > + * used for Phase control; Reset this DCM for proper clock
> > + */
> > +
> > + /* Program the DCM DRP */
> > + /* Step 1: Reset the DCM */
> > + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > + reg = reg | SDHC_TUNING_RX_CLK_DCM_RST;
> > + sdhci_writew(host, reg, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > + mdelay(10);
> > + /* Step 2: De-Assert reset to DCM */
> > + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > + reg &= ~SDHC_TUNING_RX_CLK_DCM_RST;
> > + sdhci_writew(host, reg, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
>
> Can these codes reuse?
We will modify the code to reuse it.
> If clock is upper than 50MHz, then only this code is running twice..is it
> correct?
>
No, We are handling Transmit clock control and Receive clock control here.
The code under (clock<=50000000) is shifting the transmit clock phase as per board requirement.
> > +
> > + /* For 50Mhz, tuning is not possible.. Lets fix the sampling
> > + * Phase of Rx Clock here
> > + */
> > + if (clock <= 50000000) {
> > + /*Change the Phase value here */
> > + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_DBOUNCE +
> vendor_ptr));
> > + reg &= ~SDHC_TUNING_RX_CLK_SEL_MASK;
> > + reg = reg | (SDHC_TUNING_RX_CLK_SEL_MASK &
> > + rx_clk_phase_val);
> > + sdhci_writew(host, reg, (SDHC_DBOUNCE +
> vendor_ptr));
> > + }
> > + mdelay(10);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int sdhci_pci_enable_dma_snps(struct sdhci_host *host) {
> > + /* DWC MSHC Specific Dma Enabling */
>
> Ditto.. this file is already DWC specific.
OK, We will update it.
> > +
> > + /* Call generic emable_dma */
> > + return sdhci_ops->enable_dma(host);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void sdhci_pci_set_bus_width_snps(struct sdhci_host *host, int
> > +width) {
> > + /* DWC MSHC Specific Bus Width Setting */
>
> Ditto.
OK, We will update it.
> > +
> > + /* Call generic set_bus_width */
> > + sdhci_ops->set_bus_width(host, width); }
> > +
> > +static void sdhci_reset_snps(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 mask) {
> > + /* DWC MSHC Specific hci reset */
> > +
> > + /* Call generic reset */
> > + sdhci_ops->reset(host, mask);
> > +}
> > +static void sdhci_set_uhs_signaling_snps(struct sdhci_host *host,
> > + unsigned int timing)
> > +{
> > + /* DWC MSHC Specific UHS-I Signaling */
> > +
> > + /* Call generic UHS-I signaling */
> > + sdhci_ops->set_uhs_signaling(host, timing); } static void
> > +sdhci_pci_hw_reset_snps(struct sdhci_host *host) {
> > + /* DWC MSHC Specific hw reset */
> > +
> > + /* Call generic hw_reset */
> > + if (host->ops && host->ops->hw_reset)
>
> Above other host->ops-> didn't check..do you think what's correct?
>
We missed it. We will modify the code considering Ludovic's comments.
> > + sdhci_ops->hw_reset(host);
> > +}
> > +static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_pci_ops_snps = {
> > + .set_clock = sdhci_set_clock_snps,
> > + .enable_dma = sdhci_pci_enable_dma_snps,
> > + .set_bus_width = sdhci_pci_set_bus_width_snps,
> > + .reset = sdhci_reset_snps,
> > + .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling_snps,
> > + .hw_reset = sdhci_pci_hw_reset_snps,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int snps_init_clock(struct sdhci_host *host) {
> > + int div = 0;
> > + int mul = 0;
> > + int div_val = 0;
> > + int mul_val = 0;
> > + int mul_div_val = 0;
> > + int reg = 0;
> > + u32 vendor_ptr;
> > +
> > + vendor_ptr = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_UHS2_VENDOR);
> > +
> > + /* Configure the BCLK DRP to get 100 MHZ Clock */
> > +
> > + /* To get 100MHz from 100MHz input freq,
> > + * mul=2 and div=2
> > + * Formula: output_clock = (input clock * mul) / div
> > + */
> > + mul = 2;
> > + div = 2;
> > + mul_val = mul - 1;
> > + div_val = div - 1;
> > + /* Program the DCM DRP */
> > + /* Step 1: Reset the DCM */
> > + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > + reg = reg | SDHC_BCLK_DCM_RST;
> > + sdhci_writew(host, reg, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > + /* Step 2: Program the mul and div values in DRP */
> > + mul_div_val = (mul_val << 8) | div_val;
> > + sdhci_writew(host, mul_div_val, BCLK_DCM_MUL_DIV_DRP);
> > + /* Step 3: issue a dummy read from DRP base 0x00 as per
> > + *
> http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/user_guides/ug191.pdf
> > + */
> > + reg = sdhci_readw(host, BCLK_DCM_DRP_BASE_51);
> > + /* Step 4: De-Assert reset to DCM */
> > + /* de assert reset*/
> > + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
> > + reg &= ~SDHC_BCLK_DCM_RST;
> > + sdhci_writew(host, reg, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
>
> I'm not sure but it seems these codes are also simliar to above codes.
> If i'm correct, you can reduce the code lines.
>
It's to program the DCM which is used for base clock.
We will try to optimize/reuse the code.
> > +
> > + /* By Default Clocks to MSHC are off..
> > + * Before stack applies reset; we need to turn on the clock
> > + */
> > + sdhci_writew(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_EN,
> SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +}
> > +
> > +int sdhci_pci_probe_slot_snps(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot) {
> > + int ret = 0;
> > + struct sdhci_host *host;
> > +
> > + host = slot->host;
> > + sdhci_ops = host->ops;
> > + host->ops = &sdhci_pci_ops_snps;
> > +
> > + /* Board specific clock initialization */
> > + ret = snps_init_clock(host);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sdhci_pci_probe_slot_snps);
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-dwc-mshc-pci.h
> > b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-dwc-mshc-pci.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..1635bf2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-dwc-mshc-pci.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2016 Synopsys, Inc.
> > + *
> > + * Author: Manjunath M B <manjumb@...opsys.com>
> > + *
> > + * This software is licensed under the terms of the GNU General
> > +Public
> > + * License version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation,
> > +and
> > + * may be copied, distributed, and modified under those terms.
> > + *
> > + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> > + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __SDHCI_DWC_MSHC_PCI_H__
> > +#define __SDHCI_DWC_MSHC_PCI_H__
> > +
> > +#include "sdhci-pci.h"
> > +
> > +#define SDHCI_UHS2_VENDOR 0xE8
> > +
> > +#define DRIVER_NAME "sdhci_snps"
>
> What do you use .."snps" or "dwc_mshc"?
> As i mentioned, i want not to use "*mshc*" in these patches.
>
We will use "sdhci-pci-dwc" to make it uniform.
> Best Regards,
> Jaehoon Chung
>
> > +#define SDHC_DEF_TX_CLK_PH_VAL 4
> > +#define SDHC_DEF_RX_CLK_PH_VAL 4
Thanks & Regards,
Prabu Thangamuthu.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists