[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <57172C66.2080602@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:14:46 +0200
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/11] drivers: iommu: make of_xlate() interface DT
agnostic
Hi Lorenzo,
On 2016-04-19 13:30, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:28:02AM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 2016-04-14 19:25, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> On systems booting with ACPI, the IOMMU drivers require the same
>>> kind of id mapping carried out with a DT tree through the of_xlate()
>>> API in order to map devices identifiers to IOMMU ones.
>>>
>>> On ACPI systems, since DT nodes are not present (ie struct
>>> device.of_node == NULL), to identify the device requiring the translation
>>> the struct device_node (and the structure used to pass translation
>>> information - struct of_phandle_args - that contains a struct device_node)
>>> cannot be used, so a generic translation structure to be used for IOMMU
>>> mapping should be defined, based on the firmware agnostic fwnode_handle
>>> type.
>>>
>>> This patch mechanically refactors/renames the of_xlate API to make
>>> it DT agnostic, by declaring a new type (struct iommu_fwspec), that
>>> allows the kernel to pass a device identifier (fwnode - which can
>>> represent either a DT node or an IOMMU FW node) and by changing the
>>> of_xlate signature so that it does not take anymore the DT specific
>>> of_phandle_args argument and replaces it with the DT agnostic
>>> iommu_fwspec one.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
>>> Cc: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
>>> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
>>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>>> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
>>> Cc: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>
>>> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
>>> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
>> I'm not sure if this is the right approach, although I have not enough
>> knowledge on ACPI firmware. Do you plan to rewrite all subsystems to the
>> new "fwspec" based interface? Right now of_xlate is rather common
>> interface used by various subsystems. Maybe it will be much easier to
> Yes, that's a valid concern, when you say "it is rather common" though,
> it seems to me that the of_xlate footprint is still subsystem specific,
> so this patch should be self-contained anyway (granted, doing this
> conversion for a specific subsystem is questionable, I guess that what
> you are asking is, if you do it for IOMMU, why would not you do it for
> other subsystems ?).
I was curious if you want to replace of_xlate() interface in other
subsystems
like clocks, power domains, regulators, etc. Each of_xlate interface is
specific to particular subsystem, but they all more or less follows the same
style, what makes it easier to understand the code.
> It is an RFC for this specific reason.
>
>> just add acpi_xlate callback and plumb it to the generic code? Maybe later
>> when similar code will be in other subsystems and drivers, it can be
>> unified, having much more real use cases?
> Yes, that's a possibility, it means adding yet another hook into
> the IOMMU drivers, probably a simpler change than this one, I
> posted this code as and RFC to see which direction we want to take
> so further feedback is welcome we can then choose the best approach.
>
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 12 +++++++-----
>>> drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c | 11 +++++++----
>>> drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>>> drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>>> include/linux/iommu.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
>>> 5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>>> index 6c42770..84bcff7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>>> @@ -1440,18 +1440,20 @@ out_unlock:
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>> -static int arm_smmu_of_xlate(struct device *dev, struct of_phandle_args *args)
>>> +static int arm_smmu_fw_xlate(struct device *dev, struct iommu_fwspec *args)
>>> {
>>> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
>>> - struct platform_device *smmu_pdev;
>>> + struct platform_device *smmu_pdev = NULL;
>>> +
>>> + if (is_of_node(args->fwnode))
>>> + smmu_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(to_of_node(args->fwnode));
>>> - smmu_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(args->np);
>>> if (!smmu_pdev)
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>> smmu = platform_get_drvdata(smmu_pdev);
>>> - return arm_smmu_add_dev_streamid(smmu, dev, args->args[0]);
>>> + return arm_smmu_add_dev_streamid(smmu, dev, args->param[0]);
>>> }
>>> static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
>>> @@ -1468,7 +1470,7 @@ static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
>>> .device_group = arm_smmu_device_group,
>>> .domain_get_attr = arm_smmu_domain_get_attr,
>>> .domain_set_attr = arm_smmu_domain_set_attr,
>>> - .of_xlate = arm_smmu_of_xlate,
>>> + .fw_xlate = arm_smmu_fw_xlate,
>>> .pgsize_bitmap = -1UL, /* Restricted during device attach */
>>> };
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
>>> index 5ecc86c..84ff5bb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/exynos-iommu.c
>>> @@ -1250,13 +1250,16 @@ static void exynos_iommu_remove_device(struct device *dev)
>>> iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
>>> }
>>> -static int exynos_iommu_of_xlate(struct device *dev,
>>> - struct of_phandle_args *spec)
>>> +static int exynos_iommu_fw_xlate(struct device *dev,
>>> + struct iommu_fwspec *args)
>>> {
>>> struct exynos_iommu_owner *owner = dev->archdata.iommu;
>>> - struct platform_device *sysmmu = of_find_device_by_node(spec->np);
>>> + struct platform_device *sysmmu = NULL;
>>> struct sysmmu_drvdata *data;
>>> + if (is_of_node(args->fwnode))
>>> + sysmmu = of_find_device_by_node(to_of_node(args->fwnode));
>>> +
>>> if (!sysmmu)
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>> @@ -1290,7 +1293,7 @@ static struct iommu_ops exynos_iommu_ops = {
>>> .add_device = exynos_iommu_add_device,
>>> .remove_device = exynos_iommu_remove_device,
>>> .pgsize_bitmap = SECT_SIZE | LPAGE_SIZE | SPAGE_SIZE,
>>> - .of_xlate = exynos_iommu_of_xlate,
>>> + .fw_xlate = exynos_iommu_fw_xlate,
>>> };
>>> static bool init_done;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
>>> index 929a66a..e08dc0a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
>>> @@ -436,20 +436,23 @@ static struct iommu_group *mtk_iommu_device_group(struct device *dev)
>>> return data->m4u_group;
>>> }
>>> -static int mtk_iommu_of_xlate(struct device *dev, struct of_phandle_args *args)
>>> +static int mtk_iommu_fw_xlate(struct device *dev, struct iommu_fwspec *args)
>>> {
>>> struct mtk_iommu_client_priv *head, *priv, *next;
>>> struct platform_device *m4updev;
>>> - if (args->args_count != 1) {
>>> + if (!is_of_node(args->fwnode))
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> +
>>> + if (args->param_count != 1) {
>>> dev_err(dev, "invalid #iommu-cells(%d) property for IOMMU\n",
>>> - args->args_count);
>>> + args->param_count);
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> if (!dev->archdata.iommu) {
>>> /* Get the m4u device */
>>> - m4updev = of_find_device_by_node(args->np);
>>> + m4updev = of_find_device_by_node(to_of_node(args->fwnode));
>>> of_node_put(args->np);
>>> if (WARN_ON(!m4updev))
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> @@ -469,7 +472,7 @@ static int mtk_iommu_of_xlate(struct device *dev, struct of_phandle_args *args)
>>> if (!priv)
>>> goto err_free_mem;
>>> - priv->mtk_m4u_id = args->args[0];
>>> + priv->mtk_m4u_id = args->param[0];
>>> list_add_tail(&priv->client, &head->client);
>>> return 0;
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>>> index 910826c..331dd78 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c
>>> @@ -135,6 +135,18 @@ struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_get_ops(struct device_node *np)
>>> return ops;
>>> }
>>> +static void of_phandle_args_to_fwspec(struct of_phandle_args *iommu_data,
>>> + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec)
>>> +{
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + fwspec->fwnode = iommu_data->np ? &iommu_data->np->fwnode : NULL;
>>> + fwspec->param_count = iommu_data->args_count;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < iommu_data->args_count; i++)
>>> + fwspec->param[i] = iommu_data->args[i];
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static int __get_pci_rid(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 alias, void *data)
>>> {
>>> struct of_phandle_args *iommu_spec = data;
>>> @@ -148,6 +160,7 @@ struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev,
>>> struct device_node *master_np)
>>> {
>>> struct of_phandle_args iommu_spec;
>>> + struct iommu_fwspec fwspec;
>>> struct device_node *np = NULL;
>>> struct iommu_ops *ops = NULL;
>>> int idx = 0;
>>> @@ -170,8 +183,9 @@ struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev,
>>> iommu_spec.np = np;
>>> iommu_spec.args_count = 1;
>>> + of_phandle_args_to_fwspec(&iommu_spec, &fwspec);
>>> ops = of_iommu_get_ops(np);
>>> - if (!ops || !ops->of_xlate || ops->of_xlate(dev, &iommu_spec))
>>> + if (!ops || !ops->fw_xlate || ops->fw_xlate(dev, &fwspec))
>>> goto err_put_node;
>>> of_node_put(np);
>>> @@ -189,7 +203,9 @@ struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev,
>>> np = iommu_spec.np;
>>> ops = of_iommu_get_ops(np);
>>> - if (!ops || !ops->of_xlate || ops->of_xlate(dev, &iommu_spec))
>>> + of_phandle_args_to_fwspec(&iommu_spec, &fwspec);
>>> +
>>> + if (!ops || !ops->fw_xlate || ops->fw_xlate(dev, &fwspec))
>>> goto err_put_node;
>>> of_node_put(np);
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
>>> index 0bba25e..5184d81 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
>>> @@ -85,6 +85,24 @@ struct iommu_domain {
>>> void *iova_cookie;
>>> };
>>> +#define IOMMU_MAP_SPEC_PARAMS 16
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * struct iommu_fwspec - generic IOMMU specifier structure
>>> + *
>>> + * @fwnode: Pointer to a firmware-specific descriptor
>>> + * @param_count: Number of device-specific parameters
>>> + * @param: Device-specific parameters
>>> + *
>>> + * This structure, directly modeled after of_phandle_args, is used to
>>> + * pass a device-specific description of an IOMMU mapping.
>>> + */
>>> +struct iommu_fwspec {
>>> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
>>> + int param_count;
>>> + u32 param[IOMMU_MAP_SPEC_PARAMS];
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> enum iommu_cap {
>>> IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY, /* IOMMU can enforce cache coherent DMA
>>> transactions */
>>> @@ -155,7 +173,7 @@ struct iommu_dm_region {
>>> * @domain_window_disable: Disable a particular window for a domain
>>> * @domain_set_windows: Set the number of windows for a domain
>>> * @domain_get_windows: Return the number of windows for a domain
>>> - * @of_xlate: add OF master IDs to iommu grouping
>>> + * @fw_xlate: add FW master IDs to iommu grouping
>>> * @pgsize_bitmap: bitmap of supported page sizes
>>> * @priv: per-instance data private to the iommu driver
>>> */
>>> @@ -196,9 +214,7 @@ struct iommu_ops {
>>> /* Get the number of windows per domain */
>>> u32 (*domain_get_windows)(struct iommu_domain *domain);
>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF_IOMMU
>>> - int (*of_xlate)(struct device *dev, struct of_phandle_args *args);
>>> -#endif
>>> + int (*fw_xlate)(struct device *dev, struct iommu_fwspec *args);
>>> unsigned long pgsize_bitmap;
>>> void *priv;
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Powered by blists - more mailing lists