linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] perf record: Split output into multiple files via '--switch-output'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160420075406.GC25541@krava.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:54:06 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Cc:	acme@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pi3orama@....com,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] perf record: Split output into multiple files via
 '--switch-output'

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 02:55:28PM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:

SNIP

>  		    "Record build-id of all DSOs regardless of hits"),
>  	OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "timestamp-filename", &record.timestamp_filename,
>  		    "append timestamp to output filename"),
> +	OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "switch-output", &record.switch_output,
> +		    "Switch output when receive SIGUSR2"),
>  	OPT_END()
>  };
>  
> @@ -1413,10 +1440,13 @@ out_symbol_exit:
>  
>  static void snapshot_sig_handler(int sig __maybe_unused)
>  {
> -	if (!auxtrace_snapshot_is_ready())
> -		return;
> -	auxtrace_snapshot_toggle();
> -	auxtrace_record__snapshot_started = 1;
> -	if (auxtrace_record__snapshot_start(record.itr))
> -		auxtrace_snapshot_error();
> +	if (auxtrace_snapshot_is_ready()) {
> +		auxtrace_snapshot_toggle();
> +		auxtrace_record__snapshot_started = 1;
> +		if (auxtrace_record__snapshot_start(record.itr))
> +			auxtrace_snapshot_error();

Adrian,
I know it's out of the scope of this patchset, however
should auxtrace_record__snapshot_start call be in the
__cmd_record's loop path rather then in here in signal? 

thanks,
jirka