[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1461164635-8916-1-git-send-email-tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:03:54 -0400
From: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Subject: [char-misc-next 1/2] mei: don't clean control queues on notify request timeout
From: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>
Timeout on notify request is not a fatal condition, and actually
cleaning control queues will disrupt other control flows of the
same client.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
---
drivers/misc/mei/client.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/mei/client.c b/drivers/misc/mei/client.c
index 09f5280fa021..85ae11d410cc 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/mei/client.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/mei/client.c
@@ -1337,12 +1337,8 @@ int mei_cl_notify_request(struct mei_cl *cl,
mei_secs_to_jiffies(MEI_CL_CONNECT_TIMEOUT));
mutex_lock(&dev->device_lock);
- if (cl->notify_en != request) {
- mei_io_list_flush(&dev->ctrl_rd_list, cl);
- mei_io_list_flush(&dev->ctrl_wr_list, cl);
- if (!cl->status)
- cl->status = -EFAULT;
- }
+ if (cl->notify_en != request && !cl->status)
+ cl->status = -EFAULT;
rets = cl->status;
--
2.5.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists