[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57173BFD.2040906@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:21:17 +0800
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@...wei.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: <acme@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<pi3orama@....com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] perf record: Force enable --timestamp-filename
when --switch-output is provided
On 2016/4/20 15:59, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 02:55:29PM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
>> Without this patch, the last output doesn't have timestamp appended if
>> --timestamp-filename is not explicitly provided. For example:
>>
>> # perf record -a --switch-output &
>> [1] 11224
>> # kill -s SIGUSR2 11224
>> [ perf record: dump data: Woken up 1 times ]
>> # [ perf record: Dump perf.data.2015122622372823 ]
>>
>> # fg
>> perf record -a --switch-output
>> ^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.027 MB perf.data (540 samples) ]
>>
>> # ls -l
>> total 836
>> -rw------- 1 root root 33256 Dec 26 22:37 perf.data <---- *Odd*
>> -rw------- 1 root root 817156 Dec 26 22:37 perf.data.2015122622372823
> I'm getting this:
>
> [root@...va perf]# ./perf record -a --switch-output &
> [root@...va perf]# kill -s SIGUSR2 18974
> [ perf record: dump data: Woken up 4 times ]
> [ perf record: Dump perf.data.2016042009574314 ]
>
> [root@...va perf]# ./perf report -i perf.data.2016042009574314
> perf: Segmentation fault
> -------- backtrace --------
> ./perf[0x552b0b]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x34a50)[0x7f711b434a50]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(strlen+0x2a)[0x7f711b48b33a]
> ./perf(perf_hpp__reset_sort_width+0x4f)[0x4e9b1f]
> ./perf[0x54b113]
> ./perf(perf_evlist__tui_browse_hists+0x91)[0x551361]
> ./perf(cmd_report+0x1a34)[0x434b44]
> ./perf[0x485681]
> ./perf(main+0x672)[0x424382]
> /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf0)[0x7f711b420700]
> ./perf(_start+0x29)[0x4244a9]
> [0x0]
Can't reproduce... Can you get reproduce problem without this patch (3/6)?
My local tree is based on newest perf/core (commit ccd62a8 "perf trace:
Fix build when DWARF unwind isn't available"). Could you please check your
source?
Thank you.
>
> thanks,
> jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists