[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57177C32.4090000@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 15:55:14 +0300
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
wsa@...-dreams.de
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] i2c: designware-platdrv: fix unbalanced clk enable
and prepare
On 04/14/2016 03:53 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> If i2c_dw_probe() fail, we should call i2c_dw_plat_prepare_clk() to
> disable and unprepare the clk, otherwise the clk enable and prepare
> is left unbalanced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> index 00f9e99..1488cea 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,8 @@ rpm_disable:
> pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
> }
>
> + i2c_dw_plat_prepare_clk(dev, false);
> +
> return r;
> }
>
This is a bit unclear to me does devm_clk_get take care of clk disabling
in case of probe error or driver removal?
I see Andy's 1cb715ca4694 ("i2c-designware: move to managed functions
(devm_*)") removed it but at quick look drivers/clk/clk-devres.c:
devm_clk_release() calls only clk_put and I don't see disable is done
down the path.
--
Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists