[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1461161133.6620.304.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:05:33 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc: Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
ismo.puustinen@...el.com,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] serial: 8250: split LPSS to 8250_lpss, enable
DMA on Quark
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 18:59 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:51:00PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > This is combined series of two things:
> > - split out the Intel LPSS specific driver from 8250_pci into
> > 8250_lpss
> > - enable DMA support on Intel Quark UART
> >
> > The patch has been tested on few Intel SoCs / platforms.
> >
> > This is targeting serial subsystem, thus it would be nice to get and
> > Ack from Vinod first.
> > Moreover, the series depends on [1] that is now under review.
> >
> > That's why I asked Vinod to create immutable tag / branch for the
> > [1] and the
> > dependants (at least one more, which is sata_dwc_460ex).
> The dmaengine bits look fine to me but this is dependent on another dw
> series which is undergoing changes.
Yes, I have to work on one patch at least (data-width property).
>
> I was thinking that it might be easier to merge the series thru
> dmaengine
> tree if Greg is okay with it. If not once all dw patches are merged I
> will
> give immutable signed tag
It would work for me too. Greg?
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists