[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <146116593847.17621.12790270691583056759.stgit@bahia.huguette.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 17:26:48 +0200
From: Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, james.hogan@...tec.com,
mingo@...hat.com
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qemu-ppc@...gnu.org,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH v2] KVM: remove buggy vcpu id check on vcpu creation
Commit 338c7dbadd26 ("KVM: Improve create VCPU parameter (CVE-2013-4587)")
introduced a check to prevent potential kernel memory corruption in case
the vcpu id is too great.
Unfortunately this check assumes vcpu ids grow in sequence with a common
difference of 1, which is wrong: archs are free to use vcpu id as they fit.
For example, QEMU originated vcpu ids for PowerPC cpus running in boot3s_hv
mode, can grow with a common difference of 2, 4 or 8: if KVM_MAX_VCPUS is
1024, guests may be limited down to 128 vcpus on POWER8.
This means the check does not belong here and should be moved to some arch
specific function: kvm_arch_vcpu_create() looks like a good candidate.
ARM and s390 already have such a check.
I could not spot any path in the PowerPC or common KVM code where a vcpu
id is used as described in the above commit: I believe PowerPC can live
without this check.
In the end, this patch simply moves the check to MIPS and x86.
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
v2: move kzalloc() after the check in MIPS to avoid memory leak
arch/mips/kvm/mips.c | 5 ++++-
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 +++
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 ---
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
index 70ef1a43c114..c1ce9d44d685 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
@@ -248,9 +248,12 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id)
int err, size, offset;
void *gebase;
int i;
+ struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
- struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (id >= KVM_MAX_VCPUS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ vcpu = kzalloc(sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!vcpu) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 9b7798c7b210..f705d57b12ed 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -7358,6 +7358,9 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm *kvm,
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+ if (id >= KVM_MAX_VCPUS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (check_tsc_unstable() && atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus) != 0)
printk_once(KERN_WARNING
"kvm: SMP vm created on host with unstable TSC; "
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 4fd482fb9260..6b6cca3cb488 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2272,9 +2272,6 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, u32 id)
int r;
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
- if (id >= KVM_MAX_VCPUS)
- return -EINVAL;
-
vcpu = kvm_arch_vcpu_create(kvm, id);
if (IS_ERR(vcpu))
return PTR_ERR(vcpu);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists