[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160421094503.27906446@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:45:03 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@...gle.com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>, Ning Qu <quning@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm 1/5] huge tmpfs: try to allocate huge pages split
into a team fix
Hi Hugh,
On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Please replace the
> huge-tmpfs-try-to-allocate-huge-pages-split-into-a-team-fix.patch
> you added to your tree by this one: nothing wrong with Stephen's,
> but in this case I think the source is better off if we simply
> remove that BUILD_BUG() instead of adding an IS_ENABLED():
> fixes build problem seen on arm when putting together linux-next.
>
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> ---
> mm/shmem.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/mm/shmem.c
> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -1744,7 +1744,6 @@ static inline struct page *shmem_hugetea
>
> static inline void shmem_disband_hugeteam(struct page *page)
> {
> - BUILD_BUG();
> }
>
> static inline void shmem_added_to_hugeteam(struct page *page,
I have replaced my fix with the above in today's linux-next.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists