[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <571885E8.4000301@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:48:56 +0300
From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
wsa@...-dreams.de, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] i2c: designware-platdrv: Fix runtime PM
initialization
Hi
On 04/21/2016 06:08 AM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Dear Jarkko,
>
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:53:08 +0300 Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>
>> On 04/14/2016 03:53 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
>>> When pm_runtime_enable() was being called, the device's usage counter
>>> was 0, causing the PM layer to runtime-suspend the device. We then
>>> went on to call i2c_dw_probe() on a suspended device, which could hung.
>>>
>>> Fix this by incrementing the usage counter before pm_runtime_enable().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>>> index d656657..00f9e99 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>>> @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> if (dev->pm_runtime_disabled) {
>>> pm_runtime_forbid(&pdev->dev);
>>> } else {
>>> + pm_runtime_get_noresume(&pdev->dev);
>>> pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, 1000);
>>> pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
>>> pm_runtime_set_active(&pdev->dev);
>>
>> pm_runtime_enable() here after pm_runtime_set_active() shouldn't suspend
>> as far as I understand which made me thinking if there is some other
>
> FWICT, on arm DT platform, the device usage counter is zero at the beginning,
> once we enable rpm, the i2c have chance to runtime suspend.
>
Yes it is same also for ACPI platforms. What I like to understand what
is actually causing the runtime suspend in your case.
If I add delay longer than 1 second between pm_runtime_enable() and
i2c_dw_probe() suspends still happens only after probe finishes. It will
be triggered by the drivers/base/dd.c: driver_probe_device() when code
calls the pm_request_idle().
I'm wondering is it possible there is a race with deferred probe etc.
that is causing the issue you are seeing.
--
Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists