linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: Use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO) instead of checking FOO || FOO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:29:21 +0100
From:	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Use IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO) instead of checking FOO
 || FOO_MODULE

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:45:46PM -0400, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The IS_ENABLED() macro checks if a Kconfig symbol has been enabled either
> built-in or as a module, use that macro instead of open coding the same.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
> 
> ---

8400 parts look fine to me:

Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>

Thanks,
Charles