[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160421084946.GA23774@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:49:46 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: "Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@...aro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] set_pte_at: racy dirty state clearing warning
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:01:39PM -0700, Shi, Yang wrote:
> When I enable memory comact via
>
> # echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/compact_memory
>
> I got the below WARNING:
>
> set_pte_at: racy dirty state clearing: 0x0068000099371bd3 ->
> 0x0068000099371fd3
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 294 at ./arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:227
> ptep_set_access_flags+0x138/0x1b8
> Modules linked in:
Do you have this patch applied:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/492239
It's also queued into -next as commit 66dbd6e61a52.
> My kernel has ARM64_HW_AFDBM enabled, but LS2085 is not ARMv8.1.
>
> The code shows it just check if ARM64_HW_AFDBM is enabled or not, but
> doesn't check if the CPU really has such capability.
>
> So, it might be better to have the capability checked runtime?
The warnings are there to spot any incorrect uses of the pte accessors
even before you run on AF/DBM-capable hardware.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists