linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [media] smiapp: provide g_skip_top

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160421095409.GC32125@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:54:09 +0300
From:	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
To:	Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
Cc:	mchehab@....samsung.com, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
	Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [media] smiapp: provide g_skip_top_lines method in
 sensor ops

Hi Ivaylo,

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:27:53AM +0300, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 18.04.2016 00:44, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >Hi Ivaylo,
> >
> >On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 11:12:20AM +0300, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> >>Some sensors (like the one in Nokia N900) provide metadata in the first
> >>couple of lines. Make that information information available to the
> >>pipeline.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
> >>---
> >>  drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp-core.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> >>  drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp.h      |  1 +
> >>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >>
> ...
> >
> >I'm afraid I think this is not exactly the best way to approach the issue.
> >It'd work, somehow, yes, but ---
> >
> >1. A compliant sensor (at least in theory) is able to tell this information
> >itself. The number of metadata lines is present in the sensor frame format
> >descriptors.
> >
> 
> Right. And this is where that number is taken from in the patch and made
> available to whoever wants to use it. See http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/media/i2c/smiapp/smiapp-core.c#L177
> . I don't really understand your point here. Maybe the patch description is
> fuzzy? Could you elaborate?

I missed just that part, apologies for that. I'll apply this into my tree.

> 
> >2. The more generic problem of describing the frame layout should be solved.
> >Sensor metadata is just a special case of this. I've proposed frame
> >descriptors (see an old RFC
> ><URL:http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg67295.html>), but this is
> >just a partial solution as well; the APIs would need to be extended to
> >support metadata capture (I think Laurent has been working on that).
> >
> 
> Could be, however what we have right now is http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/media/platform/omap3isp/ispccp2.c#L369.
> Also, the patch is not trying to solve the problem with frame format
> description(or anything in general), but a mere way to pass an already
> available information in the sensor which is needed by omap3isp, by using an
> already existing API. I don't see how's that related to the way v4l API
> going to evolve in some (distant?) future. Not to say that once those frame
> format descriptors are available, it should be relatively easy to simply
> remove g_skip_top_lines form v4l2_subdev_sensor_ops and fix the drivers to
> use the new API.
> 
> BTW if you have any idea on how to pass (or set) the number of lines to be
> skipped at the start of the frame to omap3isp driver in some other way, I am
> fine with dropping the $subject patch and sending another one implementing
> your proposal.

Hopefully we'll have a better solution in not so distant future. Metadata is
just a special case for frame descriptors.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@....fi	XMPP: sailus@...iisi.org.uk