[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160421021440.GB655@swordfish>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:14:40 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] printk: Make printk() completely async
On (04/15/16 22:44), Joe Perches wrote:
[..]
> > Sir, is there anything else you want me to improve in this patch set?
>
> I'm not sir, but my preference would be to move as much of the
> async/thread functionality as possible into a separate file.
hm, we are talking about some 50-60 lines of code in total (seems
that the patch set adds more comments than code), but your point
is interesting. let's say, if there will be more opinions that it
better land in async_printk.{c,h} files, then I'll take a look on
it. how does it sound?
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists