linux-kernel - Re: stable-security kernel updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5718E0B4.4070208@oracle.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:16:20 -0400
From:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, lwn@....net
Subject: Re: stable-security kernel updates

On 04/21/2016 08:56 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 03:50:34PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Updates for stable-security kernels have been released:
>>
>> 	- v3.12.58-security
>> 	- v3.14.67-security
>> 	- v3.18.31-security
>> 	- v4.1.22-security
>> 	- v4.4.8-security
>> 	- v4.5.2-security
> 
> Sasha, regardless the rest of the discussion in this thread, I find
> myself confused by the naming above. For me, 3.12.58-something means
> "something" on top of 3.12.58. Many (most? all?) forks work like this,
> but here it seems that instead it's 3.12 + your selection of fixes
> from kernels up to 3.12.58. I guess it would be much less confusing to
> call it something like 3.12.0-security58 or something like this (or
> maybe simply 3.12.0.58). Some people might be tempted to upgrade from
> 3.12.40 to 3.12.58-security and will possibly discover some breakage
> due to bugs that were fixed between 3.12 and 3.12.40 and which are not
> fixed in 3.12.58-security.

That makes sense. I'll change that.


Thanks,
Sasha