linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] crypto: s5p-sss - Remove useless hash interrupt handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160421152456.GA8087@rob-hp-laptop>
Date:	Thu, 21 Apr 2016 10:24:56 -0500
From:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] crypto: s5p-sss - Remove useless hash interrupt
 handler

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 03:44:12PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Beside regular feed control interrupt, the driver requires also hash
> interrupt for older SoCs (samsung,s5pv210-secss). However after
> requesting it, the interrupt handler isn't doing anything with it, not
> even clearing the hash interrupt bit.
> 
> Driver does not provide hash functions so it is safe to remove the hash
> interrupt related code and to not require the interrupt in Device Tree.

NAK for the DT change. If the h/w has a 2nd interrupt, then it should be 
defined. Whether the driver uses it or not is a driver problem.

Rob