[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <EE11001F9E5DDD47B7634E2F8A612F2E1ED60600@lhreml503-mbs>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:53:29 +0000
From: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>,
"jingoohan1@...il.com" <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
"pratyush.anand@...il.com" <pratyush.anand@...il.com>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] PCI: designware: move remaining rc setup code to
dw_pcie_setup_rc()
Hi Bjorn
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@...nel.org]
> Sent: 21 April 2016 16:49
> To: Gabriele Paoloni
> Cc: Jisheng Zhang; jingoohan1@...il.com; pratyush.anand@...il.com;
> bhelgaas@...gle.com; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: designware: move remaining rc setup code
> to dw_pcie_setup_rc()
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 09:43:32AM +0000, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > Hi Bjorn
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > >
> > > > > What's the hisi plan for resuming after suspend-to-RAM? How
> does
> > > the
> > > > > RC get reprogrammed after it loses all its state?
> > > >
> > > > PM is not part of the driver yet. This is planned for near
> > > > future release so haven't made such considerations yet
> > > > >
> > > > > What would break if hisi did call dw_pcie_setup_rc()? I know
> you
> > > said
> > > > > it would overwrite what the bootloader already did, which is
> true.
> > > >
> > > > I am try to figure this out now with our HW team.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > But hisi does call dw_pcie_host_init(), so it reads pp->mem
> (which
> > > > > determines pp->mem_base) and pp->lanes from the DT. Other
> drivers
> > > > > then call dw_pcie_setup_rc() which programs the RC based on
> > > > > pp->mem_base and pp->lanes. So hisi assumes UEFI programmed
> the RC
> > > to
> > > > > match the DT, while the other drivers read the DT and program
> the
> > > RC
> > > > > to match. The latter seems more robust because it enforces the
> > > > > consistency rather than relying on it.
> > > >
> > > > Yes I agree with you, however we have preferred to move RC config
> to
> > > > BIOS to have a single driver to support multiple versions of the
> > > > same SoC.
> > >
> > > I think there are two reasonable approaches:
> > >
> > > 1) A single generic driver that doesn't have any knowledge about
> the
> > > chipset registers; it uses run-time firmware interfaces to manage
> > > the bridge. The ACPI pci_root.c driver is the best example so
> far
> > > and works very well. It supports basically all x86 and ia64
> > > chipsets and requires no kernel work for new ones.
> > >
> > > 2) Native drivers specific to each chipset. These may get
> > > configuration information from DT, but they do their own
> > > register-level programming of the device without run-time help
> from
> > > firmware.
> > >
> > > I think hisi is a native driver because it uses hip05/hip06
> registers
> > > to check link state and perform config operations. And apparently
> you
> > > rely on the ATU, BAR, class, and link width programming currently
> done
> > > in dw_pcie_host_init(). But you want to rely on pre-boot firmware
> to
> > > set up the link. That doesn't make sense to me -- if the driver
> wants
> > > to twiddle the registers, it should know how to do it all. I don't
> > > see how you can reasonably manage this half-way approach.
> > >
> > > > The patch I proposed above does the same job as the original
> patch
> > > > proposed by Jisheng and also allows hisi driver to call the moved
> > > > code.
> > > >
> > > > Do you see anything wrong with it?
> > >
> > > Only that it makes the structure more complicated and we haven't
> > > identified a corresponding benefit yet.
> >
> > Finally I have checked that assigning .host_init function pointer
> > in our driver to call dw_pcie_setup_rc() will not affect the values
> > already set by BIOS.
> >
> > Also I agree with you that a hybrid approach is not ideal.
> >
> > So I will update the driver to call dw_pcie_setup_rc() from
> > .host_init and ask the BIOS team to update the firmware for next
> > releases (the driver will be backward compatible anyway).
>
> Am I right in assuming that the patch currently in my tree:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/commit/?h=
> pci/host-designware&id=1488aefa37a4033080942c860294d13c613ec829
>
> will work for you? I'm going to assume so unless I hear otherwise.
Yes you are right.
I thought it was clear by the last conclusion.
Sorry if it was not explicit.
Many Thanks and Regards
Gab
>
> Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists