[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160421203752.GL28821@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:37:52 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vince@...ter.net, eranian@...gle.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/5] perf/x86/intel/pt: IP filtering register/cpuid
bits
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 08:55:38PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> I have to disagree here. The MSRs itself can really go into msr-index.h while
> the bit definitions might go elsewhere. What's wrong with having all MSRs at a
> central place?
Same reason as for pci_ids.h - to contain only MSRs which are used in
multiple compilation units.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists