linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/9] thermal: of: Add support for hardware-tracked trip points

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date:	Fri, 22 Apr 2016 09:54:19 +0800
From:	Caesar Wang <caesar.upstream@...il.com>
To:	Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Wei Ni <wni@...dia.com>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dianders@...omium.org, Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, smbarber@...gle.com,
	Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@...dia.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>, eddie.cai@...k-chips.com,
	huangtao@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] thermal: of: Add support for hardware-tracked trip
 points

Hi Brian, Eduardo, Sascha

在 2016年04月21日 09:12, Brian Norris 写道:
> + Sascha
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 04:48:18PM -0700, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:35:59AM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>> From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
>>>
>>> This adds support for hardware-tracked trip points to the device tree
>> <cut>
>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
>>> index 97b86c5..6ef932a 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
>>> @@ -335,12 +335,14 @@ struct thermal_genl_event {
>>>    * @get_trend: a pointer to a function that reads the sensor temperature trend.
>>>    * @set_emul_temp: a pointer to a function that sets sensor emulated
>>>    *		   temperature.
>>> + * @set_trips: a pointer to a function that set low/high trip temperature.
>>>    */
>>>   struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops {
>>>   	int (*get_temp)(void *, int *);
>>>   	int (*get_trend)(void *, long *);
>>>   	int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, int);
>>>   	int (*set_trip_temp)(void *, int, int);
>>> +	int (*set_trips)(void *, int, int);
>> This is unfortunately a diverges from API available on thermal core. Can
>> you please add first on thermal core then, use it in of thermal?
>>
>> I don't want to have callbacks available only via of thermal. If we
>> allow it, OF thermal becomes a separate API.
> What ever happened to this effort?
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/59451
>
> Patch 12 and 13 look to accomplish something similar, yet they do what
> Eduardo suggested. I was testing that series at my previous job, but
> unfortunately (for the fate of this series) I left that employer before
> I could finish reviewing and testing it. Perhaps Caesar can resurrect
> and test it?

@Brian
Yes, I can

Sure, I can.

I see the Sascha's newest thermal patches in patchwork.
The following patches are still needed, right?

6446191 New          [06/16] thermal: inline only once used function
6446111 New          [07/16] thermal: streamline get_trend callbacks
6445871 New          [08/16] thermal: Allow sensor ops to fail with -ENOSYS
6445861 New          [09/16] thermal: of: always set sensor related 
callbacks
6446221 New          [10/16] thermal: Make struct 
thermal_zone_device_ops const
6446201 New          [11/16] thermal: bang-bang governor: act on lower 
trip boundary
6445891 New          [12/16] thermal: thermal: Add support for 
hardware-tracked trip points
6445911 New          [13/16] thermal: of: implement .set_trips for 
device tree thermal zones

@Sascha, Eduardo
Can you share your discussion content for the above patches as remembered?

Thanks,

-Caesar

> Brian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives