[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160422032142.GN29799@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 08:51:42 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] cpufreq: shmobile: Use generic platdev driver
On 21-04-16, 15:04, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Viresh,
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
> > @@ -29,6 +29,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id machines[] = {
> > { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5800", },
> > #endif
> >
>
> I think an #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_RENESAS block wouldn't hurt, likewise
> for the other SoCs.
> Soon you'll have this file filled with lots of compatible values for random\
> SoCs...
This is going to be done once per boot and this shouldn't hurt. And for new
platforms we may do things differently as they are going to use opp-v2 bindings.
And, so I am not really in favor of ifdef hackery :)
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists