[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160422135339.GD3217@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:53:39 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] regulator: core: Add early supply resolution for a
bypassed regulator
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:26:57PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> OK. Sorry if I have misunderstood you here, but this sounds more like
> Thierry's initial proposal [0] but ignoring the any errors returned (and
> we need to fix-up the locking in this patch). In the discussion that
Yes!
> followed I thought we agreed to only do this for the bypass case [1]. As
> far as I am concerned either will work, but to confirm we should just
> always try to resolve the supply early during regulator_register(), correct?
We need to only *fail* in the bypass case.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists