[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160422141821.GQ3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 16:18:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
boqun.feng@...il.com, waiman.long@....com,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Hans-Christian Noren Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
Miao Steven <realmz6@...il.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, cmetcalf@...lanox.com,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, dbueso@...e.de,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/31] locking: Flip arguments to atomic_fetch_or
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:09:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > All the atomic operations have their arguments the wrong way around;
>
> s/wrong/other/?
Nah, I find they really are the wrong way around. I forever write:
atomic_add(&v, val); and then have the compiler yell at me.
> > make atomic_fetch_or() consistent and flip them.
>
> BTW, there are a few other inconsistencies:
>
> atomic_add_unless()
> atomic_cmpxchg()
> atomic_inc_not_zero_hint()
> atomic_set()
> atomic_xchg
>
> git grep "\<atomic_.*atomic_t\>.*\<int\>"
Yes, but fixing those will be much more pain :/ atomic_fetch_or() was
freshly introduced and only has a few callers, furthermore, the
following patches would require it to be in line with the other
atomic_$op() due to them all being generated from the same 'template'.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists