[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160422171009.GR2998@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 18:10:09 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, pinskia@...il.com,
Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com, schwab@...e.de,
broonie@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, agraf@...e.de, klimov.linux@...il.com,
bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com, joseph@...esourcery.com,
christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/25] arm64: ptrace: handle ptrace_request differently
for aarch32 and ilp32
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:08:41AM +0300, Yury Norov wrote:
> Here new aarch32 ptrace syscall handler is introsuced to avoid run-time
> detection of the task type.
The reason for this patch isn't clear to me. What's wrong with the
run-time detection? It's not some performance critical code.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists