[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160422222447.GS13149@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 15:24:47 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
nm@...com, arnd.bergmann@...aro.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] mvebu: Use dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() to mark
OPP tables as shared
On 04/21, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> @@ -683,10 +678,15 @@ static int __init armada_xp_pmsu_cpufreq_init(void)
> clk_put(clk);
> return ret;
> }
> +
> + ret = dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus(cpu_dev,
> + (struct cpumask *) cpumask_of(cpu_dev->id));
This cast doesn't look good. Why are we casting away const?
Shouldn't dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus() take a const mask anyway?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists