[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201604240143.04330.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 01:43:04 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>, linux@....linux.org.uk,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, liviu.dudau@....com, sudeep.holla@....com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, peter@...leysoftware.com,
pawel.moll@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andy.shevchenko@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Support for Cortex-M Prototyping System
On Friday 01 April 2016, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series provides the basic support for running ucLinux on V2M-MPS2
> platform.
>
> With these patches applied ucLinux can be run on both HW and FVP models
> with Cortex-M3/M4/M7 configurations.
>
> Board description:
>
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.100112_0100_03_en/arm_versatile_express_cortex_m_prototyping_system_(v2m_mps2)_technical_reference_manual_100112_0100_03_en.pdf
>
> Application notes (cover Cortex-M3/M4/M7):
>
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.dai0385a/DAI0385A_cortex_m3_on_v2m_mps2.pdf
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.dai0386a/DAI0386A_cortex_m4_on_v2m_mps2.pdf
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.dai0399a/DAI0399A_cortex_m7_on_v2m_mps2.pdf
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.dai0400a/DAI0400A_cortex_m7_on_v2m_mps2.pdf
>
> Cortex-M System Design Kit (referenced as CMDK from documents above):
>
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0479c/DDI0479C_cortex_m_system_design_kit_r1p0_trm.pdf
>
> I'd be happy to hear any feedback/comments on this series!
>
The whole series looks good to me, please submit the patches to the
appropriate maintainers for inclusion separately:
* patches 1-2 to the clocksource maintainers
* patches 3-5 to the serial driver maintainers
* patches 6-10 to the vexpress maintainers
I think everyone is already on Cc here, but they don't want to pick the
patches out of the series separately. I expect to get the patches for
arm-soc as part of the vexpress pull requests (dt, defconfig, and core).
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists