[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1461383788-15102-1-git-send-email-yang.shi@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 20:56:28 -0700
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>
To: tj@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
lizefan@...wei.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, yang.shi@...aro.org
Subject: [linux-next PATCH] sched: cgroup: enable interrupt before calling threadgroup_change_begin
When kernel oops happens in some kernel thread, i.e. kcompactd in the test,
the below bug might be triggered by the oops handler:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/linux/sched.h:2858
in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 110, name: kcompactd0
CPU: 6 PID: 110 Comm: kcompactd0 Tainted: G D 4.6.0-rc4-next-20160420 #4
Hardware name: Intel Corporation S5520HC/S5520HC, BIOS S5500.86B.01.10.0025.030220091519 03/02/2009
0000000000000000 ffff88036173f9e8 ffffffff8152666f 0000000000000000
ffff880361732680 ffff88036173fa08 ffffffff81088b13 ffffffff81ee3372
0000000000000b2a ffff88036173fa30 ffffffff81088bd9 ffff880361732680
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8152666f>] dump_stack+0x67/0x98
[<ffffffff81088b13>] ___might_sleep+0x123/0x1a0
[<ffffffff81088bd9>] __might_sleep+0x49/0x80
[<ffffffff810706b4>] exit_signals+0x24/0x130
[<ffffffff81063cc4>] do_exit+0xc4/0xca0
[<ffffffff810201d9>] oops_end+0x89/0xc0
[<ffffffff810518c4>] no_context+0x144/0x390
[<ffffffff81542f17>] ? debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
[<ffffffff81051c1d>] __bad_area_nosemaphore+0x10d/0x230
[<ffffffff811769e9>] ? free_hot_cold_page_list+0x49/0xd0
[<ffffffff81051d54>] bad_area_nosemaphore+0x14/0x20
[<ffffffff81051f97>] __do_page_fault+0x237/0x570
[<ffffffff810522f9>] do_page_fault+0x29/0x80
[<ffffffff81be7b22>] page_fault+0x22/0x30
[<ffffffff8119d2f8>] ? release_freepages+0x18/0xa0
[<ffffffff8119f13d>] compact_zone+0x55d/0x9f0
[<ffffffff81196239>] ? fragmentation_index+0x19/0x70
[<ffffffff8119f92f>] kcompactd_do_work+0x10f/0x230
[<ffffffff8119fae0>] kcompactd+0x90/0x1e0
[<ffffffff810a3a40>] ? wait_woken+0xa0/0xa0
[<ffffffff8119fa50>] ? kcompactd_do_work+0x230/0x230
[<ffffffff810801ed>] kthread+0xdd/0x100
[<ffffffff81be5ee2>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x40
[<ffffffff81080110>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180
Since the code path may be called in interrupt disabled context, so
the might_sleep in threadgroup_change_begin() may be triggered.
Before calling exit_signals(), it already checked if it is in hard IRQ handler,
so it sounds safe to reenable interrupt at that point.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>
---
kernel/exit.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 9e6e135..c6f8e37 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -679,6 +679,14 @@ void do_exit(long code)
validate_creds_for_do_exit(tsk);
/*
+ * It is possible to get here with interrupt disabled when fault
+ * happens in kernel thread. Enable interrupt to make threadgroup
+ * happy.
+ */
+ if (irqs_disabled())
+ local_irq_enable();
+
+ /*
* We're taking recursive faults here in do_exit. Safest is to just
* leave this task alone and wait for reboot.
*/
--
2.0.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists