[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160423064745.GA4826@afzalpc>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 12:17:45 +0530
From: Afzal Mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Bluetooth: ath3k: Silence uninitialized variable warning
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:02:55PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> - int err, pipe, len, size, count, sent = 0;
> + int len = 0;
> + int err, pipe, size, count, sent = 0;
Is there any particular reason to avoid more than 1 variable
initialization in definition on a single line ?, like,
int err, pipe, size, count, sent = 0, len = 0;
have observed that none of your uninitialized variable warning fixes
does as mentioned above.
Regards
afzal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists