[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1461521349.28145.2.camel@poochiereds.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:09:09 -0400
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] __d_add(): don't drop/regain ->d_lock
On Sat, 2016-04-16 at 01:55 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
>
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> ---
> fs/dcache.c | 14 +++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> index e9de4d9..33cad8a 100644
> --- a/fs/dcache.c
> +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -2363,11 +2363,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_rehash);
>
> static inline void __d_add(struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
> {
> + spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
> if (inode) {
> - __d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
> + unsigned add_flags = d_flags_for_inode(inode);
> + hlist_add_head(&dentry->d_u.d_alias, &inode->i_dentry);
> + raw_write_seqcount_begin(&dentry->d_seq);
> + __d_set_inode_and_type(dentry, inode, add_flags);
> + raw_write_seqcount_end(&dentry->d_seq);
> + __fsnotify_d_instantiate(dentry);
Should the above be a new __d_instantiate_locked instead of open-coding
it?
> + }
> + _d_rehash(dentry);
> + spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
> + if (inode)
> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> - }
> - d_rehash(dentry);
> }
>
> /**
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists