[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160426063317.6b2f604d93c6f3d1462dacdf@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 06:33:17 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: replace assignment with comparison on
assert check
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 14:45:54 +0100
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The current assert check is checking an assignment, which will always
> be true. Instead, the assert should be checking if scale is equal
> to 0.122
>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/tests/event_update.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/event_update.c b/tools/perf/tests/event_update.c
> index 012eab5..63ecf21 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/event_update.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/event_update.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static int process_event_scale(struct perf_tool *tool __maybe_unused,
>
> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong id", ev->id == 123);
> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong id", ev->type == PERF_EVENT_UPDATE__SCALE);
> - TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong scale", ev_data->scale = 0.123);
> + TEST_ASSERT_VAL("wrong scale", ev_data->scale == 0.123);
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists