[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160425214549.GF1550@katana>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 23:45:50 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: Jan Glauber <jglauber@...ium.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/19] i2c: octeon: Add support for cn78xx chips
> Personally, I preferred the old way where each device had interrupt enable
> bits that could be controlled independently of the interrupt controller. I
> have been told that I should abandon my preference for that type of
> antiquated architecture and welcome the brave new world of the unified
> interrupt enable bit. Never the less, I still feel some nostalgia for the
> old way.
:) I think I am with you on this one.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists