[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160425131959.GE3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:19:59 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vince@...ter.net, eranian@...gle.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] perf: Introduce address range filtering
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:19:11PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> @@ -393,12 +405,64 @@ struct pmu {
> void (*free_aux) (void *aux); /* optional */
>
> /*
> + * Validate address range filters: make sure hw supports the
> + * requested configuration and number of filters; return 0 if the
> + * supplied filters are valid, -errno otherwise.
> + */
> + int (*addr_filters_validate) (struct list_head *filters);
> + /* optional */
> +
> + /*
> + * Synchronize address range filter configuration:
> + * translate hw-agnostic filter into hardware configuration in
> + * event::hw::addr_filters.
> + */
> + void (*addr_filters_sync) (struct perf_event *event);
> + /* optional */
So these two are not serialized the 'normal' way right? Does that want
more comment?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists