lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 25 Apr 2016 16:30:54 +0200
From:	Greg Kurz <gkurz@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, james.hogan@...tec.com,
	mingo@...hat.com, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	qemu-ppc@...gnu.org, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] KVM: move vcpu id checking to archs

On Mon, 25 Apr 2016 16:15:22 +0200
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com> wrote:

> 2016-04-22 16:50+0200, Greg Kurz:
> > Just to be sure I haven't missed something:
> > - change the spec to introduce the MAX_VCPU_ID concept
> > - update all related checks in KVM
> > - provide a KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID for userspace  
> 
> That is it, thanks a lot!
> 
> (From nitpicks that come to my mind ... MAX_VCPU_ID should not be able
>  to lower the VCPU_ID limit below MAX_VCPUS.)
> 

Indeed it shouldn't. Thanks for the tip !

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ