linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 13/18] coresight: tmc: make sysFS and Perf mode mutually exclusive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <571E2A7F.2070802@arm.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:32:31 +0100
From:	Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
To:	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 13/18] coresight: tmc: make sysFS and Perf mode
 mutually exclusive

On 22/04/16 18:14, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> The sysFS and Perf access methods can't be allowed to interfere
> with one another.  As such introducing guards to access
> functions that prevents moving forward if a TMC is already
> being used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   2 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
> index 25fad93b68d4..cc88c15ba45c 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static void tmc_etf_disable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>   	CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
>   }
>
> -static int tmc_enable_etf_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
> +static int tmc_enable_etf_sink_sysfs(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
>   {
>   	bool used = false;
>   	char *buf = NULL;
> @@ -190,6 +190,54 @@ spin_unlock:
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> +static int tmc_enable_etf_sink_perf(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	long val;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
> +
> +	 /* This shouldn't be happening */
> +	if (WARN_ON(mode != CS_MODE_PERF))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> +	if (drvdata->reading) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	val = local_xchg(&drvdata->mode, mode);
> +	/*
> +	 * In Perf mode there can be only one writer per sink.  There
> +	 * is also no need to continue if the ETB/ETR is already operated
> +	 * from sysFS.
> +	 */
> +	if (val != CS_MODE_DISABLED) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	tmc_etb_enable_hw(drvdata);
> +out:
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int tmc_enable_etf_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
> +{
> +	switch (mode) {
> +	case CS_MODE_SYSFS:
> +		return tmc_enable_etf_sink_sysfs(csdev, mode);
> +	case CS_MODE_PERF:
> +		return tmc_enable_etf_sink_perf(csdev, mode);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* We shouldn't be here */
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
>   static void tmc_disable_etf_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>   {
>   	long val;
> @@ -272,6 +320,7 @@ const struct coresight_ops tmc_etf_cs_ops = {
>
>   int tmc_read_prepare_etb(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>   {
> +	long val;
>   	enum tmc_mode mode;
>   	int ret = 0;
>   	unsigned long flags;
> @@ -290,6 +339,13 @@ int tmc_read_prepare_etb(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>   		goto out;
>   	}
>
> +	val = local_read(&drvdata->mode);
> +	/* Don't interfere if operated from Perf */
> +	if (val == CS_MODE_PERF) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>   	/* If drvdata::buf is NULL the trace data has been read already */
>   	if (drvdata->buf == NULL) {
>   		ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -297,7 +353,7 @@ int tmc_read_prepare_etb(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>   	}
>
>   	/* Disable the TMC if need be */
> -	if (local_read(&drvdata->mode) == CS_MODE_SYSFS)
> +	if (val == CS_MODE_SYSFS)
>   		tmc_etb_disable_hw(drvdata);
>
>   	drvdata->reading = true;
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
> index 4b000f4003a2..a9a94a09186a 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static void tmc_etr_disable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>   	CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
>   }
>
> -static int tmc_enable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
> +static int tmc_enable_etr_sink_sysfs(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
>   {
>   	bool used = false;
>   	long val;
> @@ -167,6 +167,54 @@ spin_unlock:
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> +static int tmc_enable_etr_sink_perf(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	long val;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
> +
> +	 /* This shouldn't be happening */
> +	if (WARN_ON(mode != CS_MODE_PERF))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> +	if (drvdata->reading) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	val = local_xchg(&drvdata->mode, mode);
> +	/*
> +	 * In Perf mode there can be only one writer per sink.  There
> +	 * is also no need to continue if the ETR is already operated
> +	 * from sysFS.
> +	 */
> +	if (val != CS_MODE_DISABLED) {

Could val be CS_MODE_PERF ? In other words, should we be checking :
	if (val == CS_MODE_SYSFS)  instead ?

Suzuki