lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANLsYkywBS2_wXHsjELRy-s5y36W5_U29csBfTt0h=40TNbU-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:48:11 -0600
From:	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:	Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 13/18] coresight: tmc: make sysFS and Perf mode
 mutually exclusive

On 25 April 2016 at 08:32, Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com> wrote:
> On 22/04/16 18:14, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>
>> The sysFS and Perf access methods can't be allowed to interfere
>> with one another.  As such introducing guards to access
>> functions that prevents moving forward if a TMC is already
>> being used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c | 60
>> +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c | 68
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   2 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>> index 25fad93b68d4..cc88c15ba45c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static void tmc_etf_disable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata
>> *drvdata)
>>         CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
>>   }
>>
>> -static int tmc_enable_etf_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
>> +static int tmc_enable_etf_sink_sysfs(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32
>> mode)
>>   {
>>         bool used = false;
>>         char *buf = NULL;
>> @@ -190,6 +190,54 @@ spin_unlock:
>>         return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +static int tmc_enable_etf_sink_perf(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32
>> mode)
>> +{
>> +       int ret = 0;
>> +       long val;
>> +       unsigned long flags;
>> +       struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
>> +
>> +        /* This shouldn't be happening */
>> +       if (WARN_ON(mode != CS_MODE_PERF))
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> +       if (drvdata->reading) {
>> +               ret = -EINVAL;
>> +               goto out;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       val = local_xchg(&drvdata->mode, mode);
>> +       /*
>> +        * In Perf mode there can be only one writer per sink.  There
>> +        * is also no need to continue if the ETB/ETR is already operated
>> +        * from sysFS.
>> +        */
>> +       if (val != CS_MODE_DISABLED) {
>> +               ret = -EINVAL;
>> +               goto out;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       tmc_etb_enable_hw(drvdata);
>> +out:
>> +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> +
>> +       return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int tmc_enable_etf_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
>> +{
>> +       switch (mode) {
>> +       case CS_MODE_SYSFS:
>> +               return tmc_enable_etf_sink_sysfs(csdev, mode);
>> +       case CS_MODE_PERF:
>> +               return tmc_enable_etf_sink_perf(csdev, mode);
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       /* We shouldn't be here */
>> +       return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void tmc_disable_etf_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev)
>>   {
>>         long val;
>> @@ -272,6 +320,7 @@ const struct coresight_ops tmc_etf_cs_ops = {
>>
>>   int tmc_read_prepare_etb(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>>   {
>> +       long val;
>>         enum tmc_mode mode;
>>         int ret = 0;
>>         unsigned long flags;
>> @@ -290,6 +339,13 @@ int tmc_read_prepare_etb(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>>                 goto out;
>>         }
>>
>> +       val = local_read(&drvdata->mode);
>> +       /* Don't interfere if operated from Perf */
>> +       if (val == CS_MODE_PERF) {
>> +               ret = -EINVAL;
>> +               goto out;
>> +       }
>> +
>>         /* If drvdata::buf is NULL the trace data has been read already */
>>         if (drvdata->buf == NULL) {
>>                 ret = -EINVAL;
>> @@ -297,7 +353,7 @@ int tmc_read_prepare_etb(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>>         }
>>
>>         /* Disable the TMC if need be */
>> -       if (local_read(&drvdata->mode) == CS_MODE_SYSFS)
>> +       if (val == CS_MODE_SYSFS)
>>                 tmc_etb_disable_hw(drvdata);
>>
>>         drvdata->reading = true;
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> index 4b000f4003a2..a9a94a09186a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static void tmc_etr_disable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata
>> *drvdata)
>>         CS_LOCK(drvdata->base);
>>   }
>>
>> -static int tmc_enable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
>> +static int tmc_enable_etr_sink_sysfs(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32
>> mode)
>>   {
>>         bool used = false;
>>         long val;
>> @@ -167,6 +167,54 @@ spin_unlock:
>>         return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> +static int tmc_enable_etr_sink_perf(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32
>> mode)
>> +{
>> +       int ret = 0;
>> +       long val;
>> +       unsigned long flags;
>> +       struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
>> +
>> +        /* This shouldn't be happening */
>> +       if (WARN_ON(mode != CS_MODE_PERF))
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> +       if (drvdata->reading) {
>> +               ret = -EINVAL;
>> +               goto out;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       val = local_xchg(&drvdata->mode, mode);
>> +       /*
>> +        * In Perf mode there can be only one writer per sink.  There
>> +        * is also no need to continue if the ETR is already operated
>> +        * from sysFS.
>> +        */
>> +       if (val != CS_MODE_DISABLED) {
>
>
> Could val be CS_MODE_PERF ? In other words, should we be checking :
>         if (val == CS_MODE_SYSFS)  instead ?

If we check for CS_MODE_SYSFS we also have to check for CS_MODE_PERF,
which is two checks rather than a single one with the current
solution.

Mathieu

>
> Suzuki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ