[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r3dt8yli.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:03:37 +0300
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vince@...ter.net, eranian@...gle.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] perf: Introduce address range filtering
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 07:19:11PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> @@ -393,12 +405,64 @@ struct pmu {
>> void (*free_aux) (void *aux); /* optional */
>>
>> /*
>> + * Validate address range filters: make sure hw supports the
>> + * requested configuration and number of filters; return 0 if the
>> + * supplied filters are valid, -errno otherwise.
>> + */
>> + int (*addr_filters_validate) (struct list_head *filters);
>> + /* optional */
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Synchronize address range filter configuration:
>> + * translate hw-agnostic filter into hardware configuration in
>> + * event::hw::addr_filters.
>> + */
>> + void (*addr_filters_sync) (struct perf_event *event);
>> + /* optional */
>
> So these two are not serialized the 'normal' way right? Does that want
> more comment?
Yes, will see to it.
Thanks,
--
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists