[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <571E4A2A.8070908@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 09:47:38 -0700
From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@....com>,
<linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<devel@...ica.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64
On 04/25/2016 04:13 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:40:25PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
>> From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>>
>> Based on v16 of device-tree NUMA patch set for arm64 [1],this patch
>> set introduce the ACPI based configuration to provide NUMA
>> information.
>>
>> ACPI 5.1 already introduced NUMA support for ARM64, which can get the
>> NUMA domain information from SRAT and SLIT table, so parse those two
>> tables to get mappings from cpu/mem to numa node configuration and
>> system locality.
>
> Whilst I've queued the main NUMA series for arm64, I'd really like to
> see more movement on the generic header file cleanups that you posted
> separately:
>
> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456358528-24213-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com
FWIW: Those patches should still apply. I am carrying them in my
development trees, and have not changed them in any way.
>
> Given that this ACPI series already requires some significant cross-arch
> interaction (which is actually good!), perhaps extending the clean-up
> patches to encompass some of the ACPI bits might make sense, and we can
> get that queued as a pre-requisite.
The cleanup patches you mention above are really independent of the ACPI
things. I have applied them both before and after the ACPI patches, and
both seem to work. With a quick perusal of the ACPI patches nothing
jumps out at me as being a candidate for inclusion in the header file
cleanup series.
If you think it would be a good idea, I can repost the cleanup series.
David Daney
>
> Will
>
>> v5 updates:
>>
>> - Fixed ia64 build failure by gating some unused functions with #if
>> CONFIG_{X86,ARM64}.
>>
>> - Fixed section mismatch errors for X86 case.
>>
>> - Removed unneeded #include from some files.
>>
>> - Tested to build cleanly on ARM64, X86_64, IA64
>>
>> v4 updates:
>>
>> - Updated from Hanjun Guo's v3 patches.
>>
>> - Rebased on top of v16 of device-tree NUMA patches.
>>
>> - Reordered some of the changes so that we don't introduce code and
>> then change it several times in the patch set. New code is
>> introduced in its final form. Code reused from x86 is first moved
>> with no change, and then a separate patch to make any needed
>> changes.
>>
>> - code that is used only by ia64, moved to architecture specific
>> files.
>>
>> v3 updates:
>> - Deep investigation about the ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() and remvoe
>> that for acpi/numa.c (patch 2/12)
>>
>> - Remove the duplicate NULL check for table print (patch 3/12)
>>
>> - Introduce CONFIG_ACPI_HAS_NUMA_ARCH_FIXUP to remove duplicate
>> dummy function for acpi_numa_arch_fixup()
>>
>> - Solve the problem that the mapping from logical cpu to numa node
>> is wrong which spotted out by Lorenzo
>>
>> - cleanups for x86 and move acpi_numa_slit_init() and some other
>> functions to common place, then reduce the duplicate of x86
>> and arm64 (patch 7-12/12).
>>
>> - rebased on top of 4.4 and Ganapat's v9 patch set.
>>
>> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/8/571
>>
>> David Daney (1):
>> acpi, numa, srat: Improve SRAT error detection and add messages.
>>
>> Hanjun Guo (11):
>> acpi, numa: Use pr_fmt() instead of printk
>> acpi, numa: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() with pr_debug()
>> acpi, numa: remove duplicate NULL check
>> acpi, numa: move acpi_numa_slit_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c
>> arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk()
>> x86, acpi, numa: cleanup acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init()
>> acpi, numa: move bad_srat() and srat_disabled() to
>> drivers/acpi/numa.c
>> acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1
>> acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() to
>> drivers/acpi/numa.c
>> arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT
>> acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64
>>
>> Robert Richter (2):
>> acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_arch_fixup() to ia64 only
>> arm64, acpi, numa: Default enable ACPI_NUMA with NUMA
>>
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h | 8 ++
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h | 2 +
>> arch/arm64/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 2 +
>> arch/arm64/mm/numa.c | 17 ++--
>> arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h | 3 +
>> arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c | 2 +-
>> arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c | 1 +
>> arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 1 -
>> arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/mm/srat.c | 116 +---------------------
>> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 4 +-
>> drivers/acpi/numa.c | 224 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> drivers/of/of_numa.c | 4 +-
>> include/acpi/acpi_numa.h | 4 +
>> include/linux/acpi.h | 18 +++-
>> 17 files changed, 375 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.11.7
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists