lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160425175536.GC16786@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:55:36 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] intel_sgx: driver for Intel Secure Guard eXtensions

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 08:34:10PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Intel(R) SGX is a set of CPU instructions that can be used by
> applications to set aside private regions of code and data.  The code
> outside the enclave is disallowed to access the memory inside the
> enclave by the CPU access control.
> 
> Intel SGX driver provides a ioctl interface for loading and initializing
> enclaves and a pager in order to support oversubscription.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/sgx.h                    |   4 +-
>  drivers/staging/Kconfig                       |   2 +
>  drivers/staging/Makefile                      |   1 +
>  drivers/staging/intel_sgx/Kconfig             |  13 +
>  drivers/staging/intel_sgx/Makefile            |  12 +
>  drivers/staging/intel_sgx/isgx.h              | 238 +++++++
>  drivers/staging/intel_sgx/isgx_compat_ioctl.c | 179 +++++

No "new" kernel code should ever need compat_ioctl support, please just
create your structures to not require this at all, it isn't that
difficult.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ