| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <E1aukkd-0007k5-8h@debutante>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 18:56:51 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: WEN Pingbo <pingbo.wen@...aro.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
broonie@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, stephen.boyd@...aro.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: refactor valid_ops_mask checking code" to the regulator tree
The patch
regulator: refactor valid_ops_mask checking code
has been applied to the regulator tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
>From 8a34e979f684aa13e6c4bf23b394cca9dfabf4a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: WEN Pingbo <pingbo.wen@...aro.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 15:11:05 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: refactor valid_ops_mask checking code
To make the code more compat and centralized, this patch add a
unified function - regulator_ops_is_valid. So we can add
some extra checking code easily later.
Signed-off-by: WEN Pingbo <pingbo.wen@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index 18dd7ee61455..bca9167d8c43 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -132,6 +132,19 @@ static bool have_full_constraints(void)
return has_full_constraints || of_have_populated_dt();
}
+static bool regulator_ops_is_valid(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int ops)
+{
+ if (!rdev->constraints) {
+ rdev_err(rdev, "no constraints\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & ops)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static inline struct regulator_dev *rdev_get_supply(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
{
if (rdev && rdev->supply)
@@ -198,28 +211,13 @@ static struct device_node *of_get_regulator(struct device *dev, const char *supp
return regnode;
}
-static int _regulator_can_change_status(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
-{
- if (!rdev->constraints)
- return 0;
-
- if (rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS)
- return 1;
- else
- return 0;
-}
-
/* Platform voltage constraint check */
static int regulator_check_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
int *min_uV, int *max_uV)
{
BUG_ON(*min_uV > *max_uV);
- if (!rdev->constraints) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "no constraints\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
- if (!(rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE)) {
+ if (!regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE)) {
rdev_err(rdev, "voltage operation not allowed\n");
return -EPERM;
}
@@ -275,11 +273,7 @@ static int regulator_check_current_limit(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
{
BUG_ON(*min_uA > *max_uA);
- if (!rdev->constraints) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "no constraints\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
- if (!(rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_CURRENT)) {
+ if (!regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_CURRENT)) {
rdev_err(rdev, "current operation not allowed\n");
return -EPERM;
}
@@ -312,11 +306,7 @@ static int regulator_mode_constrain(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int *mode)
return -EINVAL;
}
- if (!rdev->constraints) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "no constraints\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
- if (!(rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_MODE)) {
+ if (!regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_MODE)) {
rdev_err(rdev, "mode operation not allowed\n");
return -EPERM;
}
@@ -333,20 +323,6 @@ static int regulator_mode_constrain(struct regulator_dev *rdev, int *mode)
return -EINVAL;
}
-/* dynamic regulator mode switching constraint check */
-static int regulator_check_drms(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
-{
- if (!rdev->constraints) {
- rdev_err(rdev, "no constraints\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
- if (!(rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_DRMS)) {
- rdev_dbg(rdev, "drms operation not allowed\n");
- return -EPERM;
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
static ssize_t regulator_uV_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
@@ -692,8 +668,7 @@ static int drms_uA_update(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
* first check to see if we can set modes at all, otherwise just
* tell the consumer everything is OK.
*/
- err = regulator_check_drms(rdev);
- if (err < 0)
+ if (!regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_DRMS))
return 0;
if (!rdev->desc->ops->get_optimum_mode &&
@@ -893,7 +868,7 @@ static void print_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
rdev_dbg(rdev, "%s\n", buf);
if ((constraints->min_uV != constraints->max_uV) &&
- !(constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE))
+ !regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE))
rdev_warn(rdev,
"Voltage range but no REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE\n");
}
@@ -1354,7 +1329,7 @@ static struct regulator *create_regulator(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
* it is then we don't need to do nearly so much work for
* enable/disable calls.
*/
- if (!_regulator_can_change_status(rdev) &&
+ if (!regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS) &&
_regulator_is_enabled(rdev))
regulator->always_on = true;
@@ -2131,15 +2106,15 @@ static int _regulator_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
lockdep_assert_held_once(&rdev->mutex);
/* check voltage and requested load before enabling */
- if (rdev->constraints &&
- (rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_DRMS))
+ if (regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_DRMS))
drms_uA_update(rdev);
if (rdev->use_count == 0) {
/* The regulator may on if it's not switchable or left on */
ret = _regulator_is_enabled(rdev);
if (ret == -EINVAL || ret == 0) {
- if (!_regulator_can_change_status(rdev))
+ if (!regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev,
+ REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS))
return -EPERM;
ret = _regulator_do_enable(rdev);
@@ -2241,7 +2216,7 @@ static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
(rdev->constraints && !rdev->constraints->always_on)) {
/* we are last user */
- if (_regulator_can_change_status(rdev)) {
+ if (regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS)) {
ret = _notifier_call_chain(rdev,
REGULATOR_EVENT_PRE_DISABLE,
NULL);
@@ -2262,10 +2237,7 @@ static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
rdev->use_count = 0;
} else if (rdev->use_count > 1) {
-
- if (rdev->constraints &&
- (rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask &
- REGULATOR_CHANGE_DRMS))
+ if (regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_DRMS))
drms_uA_update(rdev);
rdev->use_count--;
@@ -2509,8 +2481,7 @@ int regulator_can_change_voltage(struct regulator *regulator)
{
struct regulator_dev *rdev = regulator->rdev;
- if (rdev->constraints &&
- (rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE)) {
+ if (regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE)) {
if (rdev->desc->n_voltages - rdev->desc->linear_min_sel > 1)
return 1;
@@ -2664,7 +2635,7 @@ int regulator_is_supported_voltage(struct regulator *regulator,
int i, voltages, ret;
/* If we can't change voltage check the current voltage */
- if (!(rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE)) {
+ if (!regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE)) {
ret = regulator_get_voltage(regulator);
if (ret >= 0)
return min_uV <= ret && ret <= max_uV;
@@ -2870,7 +2841,7 @@ static int regulator_set_voltage_unlocked(struct regulator *regulator,
* return successfully even though the regulator does not support
* changing the voltage.
*/
- if (!(rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE)) {
+ if (!regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE)) {
current_uV = _regulator_get_voltage(rdev);
if (min_uV <= current_uV && current_uV <= max_uV) {
regulator->min_uV = min_uV;
@@ -3385,8 +3356,7 @@ int regulator_allow_bypass(struct regulator *regulator, bool enable)
if (!rdev->desc->ops->set_bypass)
return 0;
- if (rdev->constraints &&
- !(rdev->constraints->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_BYPASS))
+ if (!regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_BYPASS))
return 0;
mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
@@ -4406,7 +4376,7 @@ static int __init regulator_late_cleanup(struct device *dev, void *data)
if (c && c->always_on)
return 0;
- if (c && !(c->valid_ops_mask & REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS))
+ if (!regulator_ops_is_valid(rdev, REGULATOR_CHANGE_STATUS))
return 0;
mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
--
2.8.0.rc3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists