[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <571E66C2.3000007@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:49:38 -0600
From: Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...aro.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM64: ACPI: Update documentation for latest
specification version
On 04/19/2016 05:15 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:32:22PM -0600, Al Stone wrote:
>> The ACPI 6.1 specification was recently released at the end of January
>> 2016, but the arm64 kernel documentation for the use of ACPI was written
>> for the 5.1 version of the spec. There were significant additions to the
>> spec that had not yet been mentioned -- for example, the 6.0 mechanisms
>> added to make it easier to define processors and low power idle states,
>> as well as the 6.1 addition allowing regular interrupts (not just from
>> GPIO) be used to signal ACPI general purpose events.
>>
>> This patch reflects going back through and examining the specs in detail
>> and updating content appropriately. Whilst there, a few odds and ends of
>> typos were caught as well. This brings the documentation up to date with
>> ACPI 6.1 for arm64.
>>
[snip...]
>> @@ -185,9 +185,22 @@ tables (all section numbers refer to the ACPI 5.1 specfication):
>> -- If PCI is supported, the MCFG (Memory mapped ConFiGuration
>> Table), section 5.2.6, specifically Table 5-31.
>>
>> + -- If booting without a console=<device> kernel parameter is
>> + supported, the SPCR (Serial Port Console Redirection table),
>> + section 5.2.6, specifically Table 5-31.
>> +
>> + -- If virtualization is supported, the IORT (Input Output Remapping
>> + Table, section 5.2.6, specifically Table 5-31.
>
> Why only "If virtualization is supported" ? Missing closing bracket.
Hrm. I guess that is an unnecessary qualification.
> I still question sections of this document that IMHO do not belong
> in the kernel documentation (but in the ACPI specs - eg _PRx methods
> usage), anyway the information seems accurate so, pending changes above:
>
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
>
Thanks, Lorenzo. The suggested changes all seem fine; I'll include them
in a v5.
--
ciao,
al
-----------------------------------
Al Stone
Software Engineer
Linaro Enterprise Group
al.stone@...aro.org
-----------------------------------
Powered by blists - more mailing lists