[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a8kh5v15.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:48:54 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"maintainer\:X86 ARCHITECTURE \(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>,
Wan Zongshun <Vincent.Wan@....com>,
"open list\:X86 ARCHITECTURE \(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86: add SGX definition to cpufeature
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen
> <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> From: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Should this come with a nosgx boot option and an IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL
> check to disable the feature if BIOS doesn't support it?
You can already disable every CPUID feature at boot with clearcpuid=...
No point in adding redundant options for everything.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
Powered by blists - more mailing lists