[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1461702297-7792-60-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:24:50 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 59/66] bpf/verifier: reject invalid LD_ABS | BPF_DW instruction
3.19.8-ckt20 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
---8<------------------------------------------------------------
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
commit d82bccc69041a51f7b7b9b4a36db0772f4cdba21 upstream.
verifier must check for reserved size bits in instruction opcode and
reject BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_DW and BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_DW instructions,
otherwise interpreter will WARN_RATELIMIT on them during execution.
Fixes: ddd872bc3098 ("bpf: verifier: add checks for BPF_ABS | BPF_IND instructions")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 7f68ff6..0d2cbc9 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1213,6 +1213,7 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
}
if (insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0 ||
+ BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW ||
(mode == BPF_ABS && insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0)) {
verbose("BPF_LD_ABS uses reserved fields\n");
return -EINVAL;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists