linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH arm 1/1] arm: Use _rcuidle tracepoint to allow use from idle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:26:30 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH arm 1/1] arm: Use _rcuidle tracepoint to allow use from
 idle

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:12:59PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [160426 14:08]:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:46:15PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [160426 13:42]:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:25:39PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [160426 13:12]:
> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:06:13PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:51:59PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > > > > > * Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> [160426 12:45]:
> > > > > > > > > *Whack* *Whack* *Whack*!!!
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > > > > > > index fb74dc1f7520..4fa43c02d682 100644
> > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > > > > > > > > @@ -682,12 +682,12 @@ static void clk_core_disable(struct clk_core *core)
> > > > > > > > >  	if (--core->enable_count > 0)
> > > > > > > > >  		return;
> > > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > > -	trace_clk_disable(core);
> > > > > > > > > +	trace_clk_disable_rcuidle(core);
> > > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > >  	if (core->ops->disable)
> > > > > > > > >  		core->ops->disable(core->hw);
> > > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > > -	trace_clk_disable_complete(core);
> > > > > > > > > +	trace_clk_disable_complete_rcuidle(core);
> > > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > >  	clk_core_disable(core->parent);
> > > > > > > > >  }
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Now the mole shows up here!
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > And the patch shows up here!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > And I bet you will need this one as well...
> > > > > 
> > > > > OK and now the mode is coming back after a short nap during idle:
> > > > 
> > > > Seems a bit unfair to whack it just after a short nap, but here goes!
> > > 
> > > This mode seems pretty hard headed :) Now clk_core_enable:
> > 
> > Nah, just a lot of heads...
> 
> OK that does it for me. Thanks for all the mole related whacks,
> please feel free to add:
> 
> Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>

Done!  These are at -rcu:

6eeec2b4a50c (arm: Use _rcuidle tracepoint to allow use from idle)
0efee3da3b29 (arm: Use more _rcuidle tracepoints to allow use from idle)
b6cdf6d22f52 (arm: Additional _rcuidle tracepoints to allow use from idle)
70da6fb7275b (arm: Whack another event-trace-from-idle mole)
019db9102c6c (arm: Whack yet another event-trace-from-idle mole)
ebcd2861ae27 (arm: Whack an expected event-trace-from-idle mole)

So how would you like these handled?  I would be happy to send a fresh
patch series or git pull request if you would like to send them up your
tree, or I can send them up my usual path.  Just let me know!

And I would guess that other hardware and other configurations will
cause other moles to pop their heads up, but you never know.

							Thanx, Paul