[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160426140248.023ad696@xhacker>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:02:48 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: firmware: psci: make two helper functions
inline
Dear Arnd,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 02:16:17 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The previous patch marked these two as 'static' which showed that they
> are sometimes unused:
>
> drivers/firmware/psci.c:103:13: error: 'psci_power_state_is_valid' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> static bool psci_power_state_is_valid(u32 state)
> drivers/firmware/psci.c:94:13: error: 'psci_power_state_loses_context' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
> static bool psci_power_state_loses_context(u32 state)
>
> This also marks the functions 'inline', which has the main effect of
> silently ignoring them when they are unused. The compiler will typically
> inline small static functions anyway, so this seems more appropriate
> than using __maybe_unused, which would have the same result otherwise.
oops, yes. When preparing the patch, I also thought about making them inline.
But forget to do so.
Thanks for the fix,
Jisheng
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Fixes: 21e8868 ("drivers: firmware: psci: make two helper functions static")
> ---
> drivers/firmware/psci.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> index 04f2ac5..89fcbdd 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static inline bool psci_has_ext_power_state(void)
> PSCI_1_0_FEATURES_CPU_SUSPEND_PF_MASK;
> }
>
> -static bool psci_power_state_loses_context(u32 state)
> +static inline bool psci_power_state_loses_context(u32 state)
> {
> const u32 mask = psci_has_ext_power_state() ?
> PSCI_1_0_EXT_POWER_STATE_TYPE_MASK :
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static bool psci_power_state_loses_context(u32 state)
> return state & mask;
> }
>
> -static bool psci_power_state_is_valid(u32 state)
> +static inline bool psci_power_state_is_valid(u32 state)
> {
> const u32 valid_mask = psci_has_ext_power_state() ?
> PSCI_1_0_EXT_POWER_STATE_MASK :
Powered by blists - more mailing lists